Talk:Comparison of issue-tracking systems
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comparison of issue-tracking systems article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Mantis supports LDAP
[edit]FYI, the Mantis Bug Tracker supports LDAP authentication. That's how my site uses it. Configuration is done via the config_inc.php file. Ours does LDAP lookups against a Netware server.
See LDAP for more information.
Team Foundation Server is not a bug tracker
[edit]See Team Foundation Server. It is a source control system, with some feature for project tracking, but is not a "bug tracking system" per se. If you leave it included, the question of "does it integrate with source control" is strange, because it *is* one.
Table Omissions
[edit]In order to be able to filter the table data to apply my own criteria, I loaded all the tables as of 12:00 15 June 2013 into an Excel spreadsheet. [Edit: updated on 4 December 2016]. This showed that, unsurprisingly, some tables are missing entries for some issue-tracking systems. I've updated the "General" table so that it has entries for all systems (just one was missing), and corrected some alphabetic ordering, but I just don't have time at the moment to create blank lines for all missing items. For posterity, the table below shows the entries currently missing for each of the tables, if someone wants to fix them.
Features | Input interfaces | Notification interfaces | Revision control system integration | Authentication methods |
Bontq | Bontq | Bontq | ||
GLPI | ||||
IBM Rational Team Concert | IBM Rational Team Concert | |||
Launchpad | Launchpad | Launchpad | Launchpad | |
OpenProject | OpenProject | OpenProject | OpenProject | OpenProject |
Tuleap | Tuleap | Tuleap | Tuleap |
Changes for OpenProject
[edit]Hi, I am one of OpenProject's marketing managers. The information you seem to have on this page seems to be a bit outdated. May I ask you to review the following: Creator is OpenProject GmbH The code is published under GPL v3 Implementation language is Ruby on Rails, Angular and Type Script (remove JavaScript) Backend is only PostgreSQL Launched in 2012
If you wanted to integrate OpenProject in the features table, we would be very grateful and I can provide you with the following information:
Documentation integration/generation, reporting: Yes, reporting with customizable dashboard, cost and time reports, documentation with Wiki Test planning integration: Yes Customizable workflow: yes unicode support: yes custom fields: yes SLA: yes Plugin API: yes Multiple projects: yes full text search: yes indexed full text search: no indexed file search: yes edit conflict warning: no
Regarding input interfaces, this is the information for OpenProject: web: yes mobile: yes email: yes CLI: Partial, see note 2 GUI: no REST: yes SOAP: yes Mylyn: no Visual studio: no IntelliJ IDEA: no Others: no
Notification interfaces: email: yes Rss:no Atom: yes XMPP: no Twitter: no
revision control system integration: Git: yes Subversion: yes All others: no
Authentication methods: Form based: yes public key cryptography: no Two factor: yes OpenID: Google and Azure OAuth: yes LDAP: yes Shibboleth: no Others: SAML
Containers: Docker image: yes Helm Chart: no
Many thanks for your consideration.
Kind regards, Rebecca OpenProject (talk) 14:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Do you have references for those statements? Also, I think you're supposed to use personal accounts, so for instance an username "Rebecca (OP)", or even better "Rebecca12345", as it's not generally allowed to make edits in an official capacity. See WP:ISU. Nemo 14:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)